Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
February 23, 2016 at 10:41 pm (This post was last modified: February 23, 2016 at 10:41 pm by scoobysnack.)
(February 23, 2016 at 10:34 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(February 20, 2016 at 3:04 pm)scoobysnack Wrote:
News flash, there are already cures for cancer, but they are suppressed for population control. Especially in the US, it much more profitable to provide treatments than cures.
Anyone seen the documentary Forks over Knives, which talks about the China cancer study, and the ways to suppress and reverse the growth of cancer in your body?
SUPPRESSING CANCER CURES AS A MEANS OF POPULATION CONTROL
Cancer. He said. "We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute, if it's ever decided that it should be released. But consider - if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as of something else." Efforts at cancer treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward cure. There was some statement that ultimately the cancer cures which were being hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because independent researchers might bring them out, despite these efforts to suppress them. But at least for the time being, letting people die of cancer was a good thing to do because it would slow down the problem of overpopulation.
Audio about the 1969 presentation can be found here:
