Firstly, they didn't "hack" the DNC's computers. I explained this to you at the time. I hack stuff for a living; what the Sanders campaign did wasn't hacking. They managed to access Clinton data via a normal database query. It was a failure in access control caused my failures on the DNC's part. Sure, once the person discovered they could do it, they should have stopped and reported it immediately rather than continue to search, but that doesn't mean the guy was "hacking".
Secondly, I don't see your point that "everyone knows that". I was explaining why the DNC don't like him.
Finally, if you think an independent congressman from Vermont, who doesn't hold much power in Congress, isn't a big player in either party, is an example of an "establishment" politician, I really want to know what you think an anti-establishment politician is.
Secondly, I don't see your point that "everyone knows that". I was explaining why the DNC don't like him.
Finally, if you think an independent congressman from Vermont, who doesn't hold much power in Congress, isn't a big player in either party, is an example of an "establishment" politician, I really want to know what you think an anti-establishment politician is.