(March 3, 2016 at 4:57 am)abaris Wrote:(March 3, 2016 at 4:53 am)AJW333 Wrote: The way I used "supernatural" was not as an occurrence that was simply outside current understanding, but more likely something that is above and beyond what we see as possible, given the laws that govern nature.
Why? Since we don't know how it happened, we don't know the process involved.
Why not simply say, "there are no supernatural processes, just natural processes we have yet to figure out?" The reason we have the word "supernatural" is to describe events that actually occur outside natural law, not just something that occurs within natural law that we don't yet understand. Do you see the distinction?
