RE: The Problem with Christians
March 6, 2016 at 2:03 am
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2016 at 2:09 am by AJW333.)
(March 5, 2016 at 11:34 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:Definition of natural law;(March 5, 2016 at 1:56 am)AJW333 Wrote: So using the above definition of "supernatural," abiogenesis qualifies because it violates the laws of nature which, without exception require all life to come from life. Abiogenesis violates this natural law.
There is no such natural law. Now you're just making up question begging material.
"an observable law relating to natural phenomena."
"All life comes from life" qualifies as natural law because this is the only way life occurs, unless you can give an example of non-life producing life.
(March 5, 2016 at 12:09 pm)IATIA Wrote:If God can create something from nothing then I doubt he would be prohibited from interfering with his creation in whatever way he felt like.(March 4, 2016 at 1:15 am)Kitan Wrote: I am not most atheists. I have no qualms in stating with an authority of certainty that god does not exist.
Ditto!
Supernatural does not exist (nor god). Some things may be unexplained (for now), but still natural. Even if you want to invoke the 'god thing', god would be natural and anything it did would be natural, albeit not necessarily common. No god would be capable of violating their own rules of existence.