The Problem with Christians

[Esquilax]

Actually what you describe ARE in fact considered groups.

Group: a number of people who are connected by some shared activity, interest, or quality

Today's equivocation: pretending that "people with a single shared quality which demands no other shared qualities from them," is the same as "people with a constellation of shared qualities that make consistent demands on the beliefs of those people."

You always just use whatever definition best fits what you want to be true, rather than the definition most appropriate for the situation. It's pathetic.

*emphasis mine*
And I can prove Atheists do the same thing.

No you fucking can't, but we all know that's not an impediment to you just crowing that you have, over and over, until it gets truly, existentially sad to watch.

Must I remind you of a certain incident where all the atheists were on the wrong side of the argument despite the PROOF being presented? Talk about ignoring the basics of logic in favor of making arguments to get to a preconceived conclusion...

Case in point: you're still going on about this, years later. Interestingly, you now also seem to be asserting that one incident, even assuming the truth of your deeply depressing obsession with that incident, constitutes proof positive of a consistent and totally comprehensive pattern which... I mean, it's just not. You can't use one single example as a demonstration that this is all that happens.