RE: Boin-ney, did I say it right?
March 16, 2016 at 9:12 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2016 at 9:16 am by WinterHold.)
Drich
how did "radical Islam" get into this?
I need to remind you, that the U.S is actually one of the best friends of radical Islam; radical Muslims were always buddies with the pentagon, American tax money used to pay their salaries; too.
Ever heard about operation cyclone?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone
And then again, what the hell is Saudi Arabia doing at your side? I thought radical Islam is at war with the white house, but it looks like radical Islam was busy eating the meal he bought with the salaries it received in the cold war..
Don't take my word for granted; google is there to ask it about its opinion.
The wars of America never had anything to do with radical Islam -please don't tell me you believed Bush !-, them wars had everything to do with what you're discussing: ECONOMY.
Taking it to their towns, to their cities?
You realize that the Ottoman empire fell before almost 100 years ago, right?
So wake up; Richard the Lionheart and Saladin died a long while ago.
Juan of Arc; too.
Don't use Islam as a peg.
Check post number 46. Saudi Arabia -the factory where ISIS mentality is produced- is supported, trained and PROTECTED by the U.S.
Wanna see marines, dying for "radical Islam"? check the gulf war:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
Would you like to see your tax money moving radical Islam around on 4 wheels?
![[Image: 76e47057-a206-4faf-aec0-dac8a638ead4_16x9_788x442.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=vid.alarabiya.net%2Fimages%2F2015%2F08%2F14%2F76e47057-a206-4faf-aec0-dac8a638ead4%2F76e47057-a206-4faf-aec0-dac8a638ead4_16x9_788x442.jpg)
The proxies that he unleashed during his "war on terror" comedy show, did shed blood and produced the black flags of ISIS.
Don't blame all muslims, Drich, but you must blame those who funded the so called "moderates", and remained close allies with RADICAL ISLAM =saudi arabia and the likes of it.
No. When Regan gave "stinger luanchers" to the Taliban, it was to block the soviet gunships, you know proxies never use gunships and heavyweight weapons like that.
The Taliban -and the "Mujahideen" in general- fought the soviet army directly, Russians never began to master proxy warfare until recently: and even today, the only "militia" they have in the Middle East, can be considered to be "Hezbollah" and "The houthies" in Yemen; even those are not so well trained and capable as the -Mujahideen- were.
The U.S -by far- has the superiority in proxy warfare.
Russia and the USSR never used such tactic until the U.S displayed it in the cold war, and brought down Marx's fantasy to ruins.
KevinM1
More wars=more ISIS.
MrNoMorePropaganda
The more you dwell into these videos, the more you would realize how radical Islam can be shaped into a fist that can punch anywhere.
The ultimate form of proxy warfare is this: convince people that a certain people are too many, they are wealthy too. They can exist anywhere; anytime, any moment !
by selling fear -like bush did-, wars are won. Breaking the opposing side mentally is the start.
The Saud's terrorized natives in the past with their religious militias. It's very smart to re-new the tactic.
Quote:Let's ask france what happens when we take a 'live and let live' attitude towards radical islam. It only takes one group of hateful people to start a conflict/war, there doesn't have to be consent on both sides. Radical Islam decided there will be a war, the United States simply 'insisted' we have it on their land and in their cities killing their people instead of ours.. France and other countries like it seems to think it is acceptable to allow their people to be slaughtered on mass and seemingly at Radical Islam's will, in order to maintain their philosophical positions. Which they have every right to do, but at the same time if someone has it in their mind to burn a house down and they will no matter what you try and do, then I am all for making them burn their own houses scorch their own land and kill their own children before they come here after mine.
how did "radical Islam" get into this?
I need to remind you, that the U.S is actually one of the best friends of radical Islam; radical Muslims were always buddies with the pentagon, American tax money used to pay their salaries; too.
Ever heard about operation cyclone?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone
And then again, what the hell is Saudi Arabia doing at your side? I thought radical Islam is at war with the white house, but it looks like radical Islam was busy eating the meal he bought with the salaries it received in the cold war..
Don't take my word for granted; google is there to ask it about its opinion.
The wars of America never had anything to do with radical Islam -please don't tell me you believed Bush !-, them wars had everything to do with what you're discussing: ECONOMY.
Taking it to their towns, to their cities?
You realize that the Ottoman empire fell before almost 100 years ago, right?
So wake up; Richard the Lionheart and Saladin died a long while ago.
Juan of Arc; too.
Don't use Islam as a peg.
Check post number 46. Saudi Arabia -the factory where ISIS mentality is produced- is supported, trained and PROTECTED by the U.S.
Wanna see marines, dying for "radical Islam"? check the gulf war:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
Would you like to see your tax money moving radical Islam around on 4 wheels?
Quote:MrNoMorePropaganda:
George W. Bush kissing the biggest financier of "Radical Islam" ever:
The proxies that he unleashed during his "war on terror" comedy show, did shed blood and produced the black flags of ISIS.
Don't blame all muslims, Drich, but you must blame those who funded the so called "moderates", and remained close allies with RADICAL ISLAM =saudi arabia and the likes of it.
Quote:Regan used the Taliban to fight a proxy war against the USSR Like they used the Vietnamese to fight a proxy war against us. Like with the Vietnamese Regan turned a 'policing action' for the russians into a war of attrition that they lost. Ultimately contributing to the economic crash and restructuring of Russia. Regan was indeed correct when He compared The Taliban to the Colonial Army. In that they were fighting for their interdependence from their russian colonization. However Regan was not a prophet and did not know they would turn on us. After all we did not turn on the french after the help us kick the red coats back into the sea.
The Taliban's treachery is a testament to their own wickness, not to Regan's desire to help free a Nation.
No. When Regan gave "stinger luanchers" to the Taliban, it was to block the soviet gunships, you know proxies never use gunships and heavyweight weapons like that.
The Taliban -and the "Mujahideen" in general- fought the soviet army directly, Russians never began to master proxy warfare until recently: and even today, the only "militia" they have in the Middle East, can be considered to be "Hezbollah" and "The houthies" in Yemen; even those are not so well trained and capable as the -Mujahideen- were.
The U.S -by far- has the superiority in proxy warfare.
Russia and the USSR never used such tactic until the U.S displayed it in the cold war, and brought down Marx's fantasy to ruins.
KevinM1
More wars=more ISIS.
MrNoMorePropaganda
The more you dwell into these videos, the more you would realize how radical Islam can be shaped into a fist that can punch anywhere.
The ultimate form of proxy warfare is this: convince people that a certain people are too many, they are wealthy too. They can exist anywhere; anytime, any moment !
by selling fear -like bush did-, wars are won. Breaking the opposing side mentally is the start.
The Saud's terrorized natives in the past with their religious militias. It's very smart to re-new the tactic.
