The Problem with Christians

[AJW333]

1) The chemical reactions you call "artificial" are not done by hand, but my setting conditions so that the reaction occurs automatically under those conditions. We know how it works based on the physics model of Atomic Theory, which is why we are able to accurately simulate nature. When you ask "does that occur in nature?", you're demonstrating an ignorance of how chem labs even operate.

What I asked was a perfectly valid question that anyone with a scientific brain would like to know. Here it is again;

"I would like to know what the small chemical tail was. Was it something that naturally occurs in nature or a manufactured substance?"

Let's not be so naive as to think that scientific research never has biases or that experiments can never be set up to go down a desired path. It is entirely reasonable that I ask what the chemical additive was.

2) We've covered the fact that some mutations ARE beneficial, even though most are not. The fact that you are refusing to acknowledge this simple fact tells me you're more interested in spreading Creationist propaganda than actually understanding science.

I said that the vast majority of mutations were negative. Presumably that means that a minority are either neutral or positive.

Here's a hug. It must be hard for you, out there.

Thanks. I feel better now