GMO vs Organic

[Aractus]

I've been trying to eat more organic food and avoid GMO, although it's really hard in the US.

Organic has no proven health benefits over traditionally farmed foods, and in some situation organic fertilisers are more potent to human health than non-organic fertilisers due to containing higher levels of heavy metals.

GMO is not a proven technology either. It has the potential to bring health benefits, but they might be accompanied by unintended negative consequences. If you want my advice, it's not a bad idea to buy non-GMO, but there's no reason to buy organic unless there's a specific environmental benefit for the specific product - but in most cases organic alternatives to traditional fertilisers and pesticides are actually worse for the environment and/or human health (mostly they end up being worse ecologically speaking, and sometimes they are worse for human health... but the health concern of organic fertilisers may or may not be present in the final product).

If ecology is a concern to you then learn where your food comes from. Avoid buying unnecessary overseas imports - it's better ecologically to buy local GMO than to buy foreign foods from China, or where-ever they send fresh produce from where you live. Even local ecology is not straightforward. Pretty much all local produce here in Canberra (including at the markets) that is produced in Bega is sent to Sydney first, and then comes back to Canberra. It's economical, but not ecological.