(March 21, 2016 at 7:54 pm)Kitan Wrote: What confuses me is how you make the leap from complex to design. You are not giving the allowance for anything else. That is your problem, due to your already preconceived notions of how you think. You are not examining anything. Rather, you are seeking tidbits of information that already supports your dim view of reality.What confuses me is that you can admit that a watch has evidence of design but that the human body, which is infinitely more complex does not. I've laid out the statistical impossibility of DNA code mutations resulting in the production of the 100,000+ proteins in the body but still you choose to believe that it is possible. I would consider that to be faith of the highest order.
Dawkins himself said that natural selection "has no mind and no mind's eye. It does not plan for the future. It has no vision, no foresight." ie it is completely at the mercy of random chance.
