(March 30, 2016 at 10:21 pm)abaris Wrote:(March 30, 2016 at 9:38 pm)AAA Wrote: Are you guys saying that DNA does not convey information? I don't even think there is any debate in the scientific community. It clearly does. For example, chapter 33 in my biochemistry textbook is called: The Structure of Informational Macromolecules: DNA and RNA
No, we're telling you to get a fucking education before quoting things you clearly don't understand. But be my guest, keep talking out of apologist's ass for all I care. Been there, done that. Lost interest in this thread quite some time ago, going by your select replies. When your 101 on how to counter atheist claims fails, it's only the sound of silence or some quote taken totally out of context, as I have proven to be the case before.
This was my first response on this thread, so I'm not sure what you mean by select replies and countering atheist claims. Do you want to take it up with Tymoczko, Berg, and Stryer? These are the authors of the textbook. It isn't out of context, it is the title of a chapter.