(March 31, 2016 at 2:04 pm)abaris Wrote:(March 31, 2016 at 1:47 pm)AAA Wrote: Here are just a few of the top google searches. I don't really think that finding scientists on your side of a debate is significant though. You could find scientists who believe almost anything. I would rather focus on the specifics of cellular biology.
Did you actually look at the names you've given and what they stand of stood for? Or is Michelle Bachmann enough of an authority to make your case?
Here's just one of them. Wonder how he manages to square his circle, but it's the only one mentioned in a relevant field of science. It's also pointed out that he's one of the very few believing in intelligent design.
Quote:Unlike William A. Dembski and others in the intelligent design movement, Behe accepts the common descent of species, including that humans descended from other primates, although he states that common descent does not by itself explain the differences between species. He also accepts the scientific consensus on the age of the Earth and the age of the Universe.
So he doesn't dispute scientific facts but still insists on intelligen design. Curious.
Behe is a biochemist correct? That's in the relevant feild. There were physicists in there too.There were also microbiologists, geneticists, and astrobiologists. But again you can find scientists on any side of a debate. There are scientists who deny global warming. You have to look at the evidence yourself and not take what someone else tells you as truth.