(April 11, 2016 at 8:21 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(April 11, 2016 at 7:02 pm)AAA Wrote: Point out one lie
Just did. You declared that Prof Dawkins made arrogant statements in TGD, then used that declaration to assess the man as arrogant, angry and hate-filled (which you dismiss as "sad"). However, you don't actually present any of these arrogant statements to support your strawman assessment. We are thus free to speculate that you know that you cannot. Thus your declaration is the opposite of honest. The opposite of an honest statement is a dishonest one, or more generally a lie. Unless you prefer the competing interpretation, that you were being unknowingly dishonest, also termed 'gullible'?
What I said was sad was that someone could be so full of hate. I say that he made arrogant statements because he says things like religious people are gullible. He also says things like if government officials are educated, then a significant portion of them should be atheists. He also says he has doubts whether theology should be a subject at all. But honestly out of everything I've said on this forum if the only lie is an objective statement like Dawkins is arrogant, them I'm doing pretty well.