Purple,
Much of your argument hinges on the existence of an afterlife. Until you can present evidence in support of an afterlife all subsequent arguments can simply be dismissed as unsound.
Your assertion that anything is possible in our expansive universe also has a couple fatal flaws:
1. Not everything is possible in the universe based on known physical laws. If your following rationalization is that there are places in the universe where its laws are suspended then we are then simply talking miracles which can be dismissed pending demonstration.
2. For entities whose existence may not violate physical laws (unicorns, dragons, et. al.) you conveniently forget that the claims of these magical beings are said to exist or have existed here. Claiming that they may exist 'somewhere' doesn't save your position.
Your assertions are simply untenable.
Much of your argument hinges on the existence of an afterlife. Until you can present evidence in support of an afterlife all subsequent arguments can simply be dismissed as unsound.
Your assertion that anything is possible in our expansive universe also has a couple fatal flaws:
1. Not everything is possible in the universe based on known physical laws. If your following rationalization is that there are places in the universe where its laws are suspended then we are then simply talking miracles which can be dismissed pending demonstration.
2. For entities whose existence may not violate physical laws (unicorns, dragons, et. al.) you conveniently forget that the claims of these magical beings are said to exist or have existed here. Claiming that they may exist 'somewhere' doesn't save your position.
Your assertions are simply untenable.
