RE: Oh, Thank you, Your Ass-Holiness....
April 12, 2011 at 9:09 pm
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2011 at 9:12 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
I disagree; I think his point is that he would defend a pedophile even if he were a victim because molestation is an embarrassing but harmless experience. But again, we all know very well that you guys would not go through such lengths to defend any priest if they had made remarks half this ambiguous or unclear. Be honest now.
(April 12, 2011 at 9:08 pm)Skipper Wrote: No, Waldorf you are clearly wrong and are reading the paragraph in the context that gives it the meaning you want it to have, a well rehearsed talent of the religious.
I think you are doing this very thing in all honesty. Surely Richard Dawkins, hero to atheists far and near, intellectual giant, and pillar of virtue and morality can't believe that something as evil as molestation is no big deal can he!? Oh no!