RE: Oh, Thank you, Your Ass-Holiness....
April 13, 2011 at 8:01 pm
(This post was last modified: April 13, 2011 at 8:07 pm by OnlyNatural.)
(April 13, 2011 at 4:01 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Maybe I just don't understand what you mean. Do you judge the wrongfulness of an action by how much harm it can cause a person?
Guess I just don't really get Dawkin's point, children can be affected in greatly different ways by a variety of different actions (i.e. abuse, teaching of religion, teaching of evolution) - this does not in itself make the action wrong or right in my opinion. I think even if the child enjoyed the molestation it does not make it any less wrong. Maybe that is where Dawkins and I actually differ. Thoughts?
Well yes, I'd say in general that something is 'wrong' if it causes people harm. But I hesitate to make sweeping statements, because each situation must be seen in context. If the child enjoyed being molested? I don't really see that happening, but if it did, I suppose that would be in the same wrongness category as statutory rape, or corrupting a minor, or something along those lines.
(April 13, 2011 at 4:01 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: As to your last point, I guess that just depends on what religion we are teaching the child.
It doesn't depend on the specific religion being taught, it depends on HOW the religion is being taught to children.
![[Image: 186305514v6_480x480_Front_Color-Black-1.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv474%2Ftirenon%2F186305514v6_480x480_Front_Color-Black-1.jpg)