Could E.T. have influenced religion?

[lilphil1989]

So your quite sure that man was prehistoric at that time period?

This kind of cave-painting often predates written records. That is why I referred to prehistoric man. If this particular painting is younger than the start of written records in the region it was found, then my use of the word prehistoric was incorrect and I apologise.
However, why you choose to attack such a minor point that isn't even particularly relevant to my conclusion is beyond me.

Maybe you didn't realize that evolution takes more than a couple million years, if not hundreds of millions, tens of millions.

I'm quite aware of that. Although I don't see the relevance.

Most of it is actually concidered forbidden archeology, because it goes against everything we believe in, especially religion.

The psuedoscientist always claims that the scientific concensus is a conspiracy against him. The homeopath claims it. The acupuncturist claims it. The intelligent design proponent claims it. And it is never true.

Their is actually a working GEAR mechanism clock dated around 1000 A.D. So get your facts right bro. http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/archaeolo...anism.html

So what? Humans are smart creatures. How is a 1000y.o. gear mechanism evidence of alien life?

So get your facts right bro.

Get my facts right about what? I never disputed the existence of a 1000 year old gear mechanism.
And I'm not sure the aggressive tone is really necessary...

Haha, now your thinking like a thiest

How so? Because I refuse to accept a claim without good evidence?

Aliens do exist but maybe their afraid of the thiest.

Then show us the evidence of their existence. Until you do, your claim is no better than the theist's claims about the existence of god(s).