RE: Could E.T. have influenced religion?
April 15, 2011 at 6:29 am
(This post was last modified: April 15, 2011 at 6:47 am by lilphil1989.)
Oh come off it. Not all claims are equal. Some claims are well supported by evidence, some are reasonable given the evidence and some are completely unsupported. Yours fall into the latter group.
Funny, that's exactly what my aunt says to me about jesus.
Actually we do, the fossil evidence suggests that humanity is somewhere around 200,000 years old.
Just because something is underwater now doesn't mean it has always been so. The Beringia land-bridge for example, which allowed human migration to North America from Asia was only completely submerged somewhere around 6000 years ago.
JohnDG Wrote:you'll see them eventually their not hidden, just disbelieved in
Funny, that's exactly what my aunt says to me about jesus.
JohnDG Wrote:It's relevant in the fact we don't even know hold old humanity is yet. There are cities under the sea for example, how would ancient man build cities under water?
Actually we do, the fossil evidence suggests that humanity is somewhere around 200,000 years old.
Just because something is underwater now doesn't mean it has always been so. The Beringia land-bridge for example, which allowed human migration to North America from Asia was only completely submerged somewhere around 6000 years ago.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
