RE: Could E.T. have influenced religion?
April 20, 2011 at 6:44 am
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2011 at 6:45 am by lilphil1989.)
(April 20, 2011 at 6:33 am)JohnDG Wrote: Im not trying to invalidate anything anyone said, I just one one specific person to stop talking as If everything I said actually happend, I want to emphasize it's possible not real.
It's been said several times by several people in this thread that just because something is possible, it is not necessarily plausible, but you just seem to ignore it every time.
(April 20, 2011 at 6:33 am)JohnDG Wrote: I don't mind you Lil phil infact I rather enjoy going back and forth with you and other's simply because it make's me more knowledgable.
Good, me too
(April 20, 2011 at 6:33 am)JohnDG Wrote: But there's just a person, thats really irratating.
In my experience, if someone is offending or aggravating you, it's better to be upfront about it, than taking that kind of passive-aggressive approach.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
