To circumcise or not to circumcise?

[deleteduser12345]

Not.  In my generation most american boys were circumcised (I've never actually seen an uncircumcised penis in the flesh).  Although circumcision was sold to americans as a hygienic measure,  it really has no health benefits. It reduces sensation. It's a painful thing to do to a baby.  I wouldn't do it to any child of mine. In a better world it would be illegal.

I have seen an uncircumcised penis and I tell you there is nothing more disgusting than a man who expects me to lick a lollipop with the wrapper still on it.   They look dirty.  But a circumcised penis is lovely. It's a work of art.

Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is like comparing cutting your cuticles to cutting off your finger.  It's an operation, no more barbaric than any other operation.Y

In that case, you're the problem. You don't see europeans complaining and the majority of them are uncut. And would you really sacrifice a man's sensitivity by far just so you can enjoy giving a blowjob? You can get used to a foreskin but he can't get used to his penis being numb. Would you circumcise your son and potentially ruin his penis and if not ruin, make it worse for no good reason, just so that his future lover doesn't throw up on the sight of his cock?