(June 10, 2016 at 8:12 pm)Jello Wrote:(June 10, 2016 at 8:10 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Right, because that's exactly what I was saying.
You have said that mutilating someone (circumcision) is your preference. I made a small exaggeration on that.
It's weird. You mutilate a child without it's consent, nobody bats an eyelid. Mutilate an adult without their consent, it's suddenly a crime.
You made the assertion that everyone on the for side of the discussion is saying uncircumcised penises are "ewwwww dirty." I responded by saying that while I think it looks better circumcised, I don't think the other alternative is "ewwww dirty."
Yeah, I think it looks better. But as I have explained, it's not like that's the legitimate reason I voted yes up top. You're making it sound like it is.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
