(June 10, 2016 at 7:33 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:(June 10, 2016 at 6:05 pm)Heatheness Wrote: Lets see... you are wrong here "there is nothing more disgusting than a man who expects me to lick a lollipop with the wrapper still on it", this is a personal opinion and not relevant to anyone but you. If you're not smart enough to slide the skin back I wouldn't want you near my penis, if I had one.First it's an opinion then it's a matter of being smart. Really? So you wouldn't want me anywhere near your uncircumcised penis if you had one. I'd prefer that to a guy who would ask me to push his foreskin back. That's not a matter of smart. That's a matter of I will not do it.
And... "They look dirty", no, wrong again, they don't look dirty unless they are dirty and if so you need to suck cock with a better class of men.
And last but not least... "Comparing male circumcision to female circumcision is like comparing cutting your cuticles to cutting off your finger." Oopsie! Wrong again, there are a dozen types of female genital mutilations ranging from removing the hood of the clitoris to trimming the labia majora and or the labia minora to a complete removal of both including the clitoris and all it's connected organ as well as sewing up the vagina. Not all are a complete mutilation of every sexual sensory receptors but all are still mutilations and so are male circumcisions. They are all unnecessary operations.
It is barbaric to strap a child down and force a it to have an operation on its perfectly healthy normal body parts for a fashion statement.
I was not wrong about the kind of female circumcision which does involve mutilation and long term disfigurement of sexual apparatus. Male circumcision is not mutilation. It does not involve cutting away something that will leave the man unable to function or experience pleasure.
Because I love you, all I can say is that you really should educate yourself on a topic before speaking about it...