(June 11, 2016 at 5:34 pm)paulpablo Wrote:(June 11, 2016 at 12:52 pm)Heatheness Wrote: I am not a male with a penis but this is the info I have read and been given by males. The sensitive part has been removed. Not all areas of the foreskin are the same just like not areas of the labia are the same. Some more sensitive than others. If you think your glans is sensitive now after years and years of being exposed to clothing and touching how do you think it might feel if it had been protected by skin all this time?
The part that is removed has generally 20,000 more sensory cells in it than after you cut it off. 20k lovely little sexual firing pins that you just don't have anymore. Kind of like the difference between your penis head and your shaft. Just think what sex might be like if your shaft felt like your penis head feels during sex.
Sorry I made a pretty huge error in that post. I fell asleep after posting which is why I'm only correcting it now.
I'm actually UN circumcised. So I meant to type "Any other un circumcised males feel like that?"
So I have my full foreskin and it feels about as sensitive as the shaft, no where near as sensitive as the head.
After thinking about it though there are bits of the foreskin that are sensitive but just not in a sexual way. Sensitive like fingertips are sensitive but not orgasm educing.
I'm still against circumcision but I don't think cutting the sensitive part of the foreskin off would reduce sensitivity in the way that some people are thinking. It's sensitive yes, but not in the same way that the head is.
Get rid of that protection, and that head will be less sensitive than your shaft.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)