Social Darwinism/Euginics has played a large role in the west to control the masses:
read the history of it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
The Nazis are the best known example of using it to control the masses. Ask any WW2 historian.
Now you claim that the way this religion is conducted resembles that a of a monarchy/dictatorship government. This may have happened in the past, and many experts make it clear that kind of rule is incorrect! There are millions of sites that discuss why monarchy is not allowed in this religion.
The consensus is that it is not the correct way to govern. The correct way is a free republic, with decentralized democratic governments. People having the freedom to move to communities that consist of laws/ideals they are attracted to. The religion is used as moral guideline in your day-to-day interactions.
read the history of it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
The Nazis are the best known example of using it to control the masses. Ask any WW2 historian.
Now you claim that the way this religion is conducted resembles that a of a monarchy/dictatorship government. This may have happened in the past, and many experts make it clear that kind of rule is incorrect! There are millions of sites that discuss why monarchy is not allowed in this religion.
The consensus is that it is not the correct way to govern. The correct way is a free republic, with decentralized democratic governments. People having the freedom to move to communities that consist of laws/ideals they are attracted to. The religion is used as moral guideline in your day-to-day interactions.
(April 22, 2011 at 4:50 am)Zen Badger Wrote: You made the spurious claim that the ruling elite use "social darwinism" to control the masses.
I made the point that since Darwins theory is only 150 years old that is not correct, that in fact the elite use religion to control the population.
And where in the koran does it say that islam is against the elite?
