RE: Love
June 14, 2016 at 9:05 pm
(This post was last modified: June 14, 2016 at 9:16 pm by Thomas Kelly252525.)
(June 14, 2016 at 7:49 pm)Losty Wrote:(June 14, 2016 at 7:43 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Rhythm,
It appears some of our thoughts have been similar. It may be thought that people may have a combination of ugly parts and beautiful/handsome parts, more ugly parts than beautiful/handsome parts or more beautiful/handsome parts than ugly parts or 50% ugly parts and 50% beautiful/handsome parts. Some people may think that if you have only one small imperfection then you're ugly in appearance. It may be thought that how high the level of ugly is, it should not change the high level of goodwill towards humanity, including severely physically disabled people. Some people may think it's right that the parents of a severely physically disabled person tell that person that they love them.
Wut.
Physical attraction is subjective. And also, being physically disabled doesn't stop a person from being attractive. I think there's no such thing as 45% ugly and 55% beautiful.
Most people don't fall in love with people they're not attracted to, it doesn't mean that person is ugly or that the person not attracted to them is shallow.
Losty,
By saying attraction is subjective, do you think it means it's bias ?
I wasn't saying physically disabled people don't have any beautiful/handsome parts.
Why may you think there's no such thing as 45% ugly and 55% beautiful ?
Maybe we'll agree there is rational thinking in goodwill towards people. Like I said before in this thread, a person may be thought of as being ugly and having rational character and some people may think it's right to marry them.
Are you thinking that some people won't be pleased by a mostly beautiful/handsome person ?