RE: Love
June 15, 2016 at 11:18 pm
(This post was last modified: June 15, 2016 at 11:20 pm by bennyboy.)
(June 15, 2016 at 7:27 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Those words add more evidence for my investigation into your character and level of thinking.If you say so.
Quote:It may be seen that I posted a definition of beautiful sometime before this post. A definition of Beautiful - pleasing the senses or mind aesthetically. Do you agree with that definition ?Sure. Except then beauty isn't a property of things, but rather a person's emotional response to things which are themselves not intrinsically beautiful.
Quote:How can you be biased about a subjective position? If you want to say I'm biased in favor of chocolate ice cream over strawberry, that's a pretty strange way to look at things. I likes what I likes-- that's not bias, it's a definition of what "like" means. And beauty, by your definition, is no different.
Do you think a person may be unbiased ?
Quote:You might have agreed with the definition of beautiful.Your definition is subjective, and is not a property of any thing which may be called "beautiful." At best, you could define beauty in terms of neuronal activity, and say, "This sunset triggers 15% of neurons in X portion of the brain." How else would you attach a number to beauty?
Quote:You may have looked at my question about being unbiased.My experience with Christians is that "unbiased" means "open to unsubstantiated fairy tales despite a lack of evidence or reason." How am I doing?