The argument is valid but its soundness has been debunked.
The flaw is with premise 1. The others are fine.
The flaw is with premise 1. The others are fine.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2025, 9:22 am
Thread Rating:
|
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God | athrock | 429 | 117389 |
March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
| Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid | Paraselene | 26 | 8991 |
May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
