Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 30, 2025, 2:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
#37
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
(June 19, 2016 at 2:52 pm)SteveII Wrote: A maximally great being would be a necessary being because it could not be contingent on another (then that would be a greater being). 

You can dream up all the parodies you like but you have to answer the question of why whatever example is necessary rather than contingent.

And how much great can you imagine this being? Can it be so great that it can create a rock so heavy that it can not lift it?
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by Fake Messiah - June 20, 2016 at 3:08 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 92286 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Silver 26 7295 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)