You must admit... God or no god is more rational than "no God or God"... which is a logical refutation of every bit of the atheist speculation which "invalidates ontlogicial argeuments".
The ontologicial arguement is based on truth based claims, which appear to be quite obvious, even so much as refuting philosophical notions, instead what they do in fact is create further philsophical speculations, it is my hope that they are nature based, thus proving gods existance on default... This is something atheists could never hope to do.
The ontologicial arguement is based on truth based claims, which appear to be quite obvious, even so much as refuting philosophical notions, instead what they do in fact is create further philsophical speculations, it is my hope that they are nature based, thus proving gods existance on default... This is something atheists could never hope to do.
