Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 3, 2025, 6:07 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
#57
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
(June 21, 2016 at 1:24 am)IATIA Wrote:
(June 21, 2016 at 1:06 am)JBrentonK Wrote: The ontologicial arguement is based on truth based claims,

NO, it is not!  Have you actually read it?  Premise #1 is never proven which invalidates the entire argument.  It is not proven or deduced within the argument nor anywhere else.  The "ontologicial arguement" is completely invalid (and misspelled).

You do realize you're talking to crazy, right?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by Esquilax - June 21, 2016 at 1:33 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 103186 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Silver 26 8179 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)