(June 21, 2016 at 1:24 am)IATIA Wrote:(June 21, 2016 at 1:06 am)JBrentonK Wrote: The ontologicial arguement is based on truth based claims,
NO, it is not! Have you actually read it? Premise #1 is never proven which invalidates the entire argument. It is not proven or deduced within the argument nor anywhere else. The "ontologicial arguement" is completely invalid (and misspelled).
You do realize you're talking to crazy, right?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!