RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
June 21, 2016 at 12:33 pm
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2016 at 4:42 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(June 19, 2016 at 3:15 pm)Esquilax Wrote: If you're just building necessity into the definition of maximally great, then first of all congratulations, you've got subjective opinion number 9,800,654 on what constitutes maximally great, and unfortunately for you your personal opinions are no more binding or objective than anyone elses'.
Not only that but any ostensible argumentation that assumes the conclusions it sets out to demonstrate is not actually argumentation.
