Defining existence into the essence of something also completely ignores the separation of existence and essence. It ignores basic elementary philosophy. You can't include the existence of something as part of its essence, whether something exists is a completely different question to what that something being defined is hypothetically.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 22, 2025, 7:03 pm
Thread Rating:
|
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God | athrock | 429 | 101872 |
March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
| Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid | Silver | 26 | 8038 |
May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
