(June 22, 2016 at 6:43 am)SteveII Wrote: I don't think it is even broadly logical possible that a maximal evil being exists. With omnipotence alone, that being would be required to prevent all good in all possible worlds. Since that is not the case in this possible world, I think the parody fails.By that token.... with omnipotence alone, a maximally good being would be required to prevent all evil in all possible worlds. Since that is not the case in this possible world, that would mean a maximally good being does not exist.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2025, 2:07 am
Thread Rating:
|
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
|
 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God | athrock | 429 | 117641 |
March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
| Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid | Paraselene | 26 | 9000 |
May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
