(June 22, 2016 at 6:43 am)SteveII Wrote: I don't think it is even broadly logical possible that a maximal evil being exists. With omnipotence alone, that being would be required to prevent all good in all possible worlds. Since that is not the case in this possible world, I think the parody fails.By that token.... with omnipotence alone, a maximally good being would be required to prevent all evil in all possible worlds. Since that is not the case in this possible world, that would mean a maximally good being does not exist.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 19, 2025, 11:55 am
Thread Rating:
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God | athrock | 429 | 92877 |
March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid | Silver | 26 | 7337 |
May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)