Numerical order of things seems to be an artifact of the perception of time, and does not address at all the fundamental nature of time. Why for example do the numerical order not count backwards? What explains why appearently truly random events like radioactive decay is still perceived as an ordered series of events?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 7, 2025, 2:46 pm
Thread Rating:
"Time" not a dimension.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Space-Time: The Bopdie Twins: If Space is Expanding Isn't Time Expandin Too? | Rhondazvous | 14 | 2402 |
August 2, 2017 at 8:06 am Last Post: Rhondazvous |
|
How to imagine the tenth dimension | Aegon | 24 | 6267 |
December 10, 2016 at 7:56 pm Last Post: TheRealJoeFish |
|
Does proof of time not exist in science? | fr0d0 | 21 | 6258 |
June 23, 2014 at 3:40 am Last Post: fr0d0 |
|
Sir Isaac Newton Time life magizines "Greatest scientific thinker of our time" | franca | 6 | 6432 |
October 6, 2012 at 1:48 pm Last Post: Cyberman |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)