|
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
|
 (June 22, 2016 at 9:38 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Meaning that if you list all the properties of a thing then saying a thing exists adds nothing to the description that wasn’t already there. That's because it's a separate question. Quote: My point is that a proper consideration of existence takes into account the degree to which something participates in what is essential to its quiddity. No existence is a separate question. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God | athrock | 429 | 102143 |
March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am Last Post: robvalue |
|
| Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid | Silver | 26 | 8047 |
May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
|
