Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 17, 2024, 10:31 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
(June 23, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
ChadWooters Wrote:if you list all the properties of a thing then saying a thing exists adds nothing to the description that wasn’t already there.

That's because existence and essence are separate. This is exactly my point: Existence is NOT a property. "What is X?" and "Whatever "X" that we conceive of supposedly is, does it actually exist?" are two separate questions.

Rather than restating your objection, which I obviously fully understand, please address my concern about different kinds of objects that have nothing else in common except their existence.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by Neo-Scholastic - June 24, 2016 at 9:34 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 77278 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Foxaèr 26 6510 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)