Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 30, 2025, 2:48 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
(June 24, 2016 at 6:00 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:
(June 24, 2016 at 3:53 pm)SteveII Wrote: Depends. Is it a greatest conceivable light bulb or the everyday kind? If it's the greatest conceivable kind, you wouldn't have to change it because it would necessarily be lit all the time in all possible worlds!

Actually God is everything at it's ultimate. Whatever is negative, you would take the negative qualities, turn them to positive, and he would be in someway the ultimate that thing. That's because everything get's it's existence and reality from God. God is what defines things nature, his own light and what they are with respect to that. That is why everything is a sign of God.

Why would you call that 'God' and not just 'the Universe'?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by Veritas_Vincit - June 26, 2016 at 4:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 92286 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Silver 26 7295 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)