Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 27, 2025, 10:06 pm

Poll: Monogamous or not
This poll is closed.
monogamous
76.92%
30 76.92%
not monogamous
15.38%
6 15.38%
some other description
7.69%
3 7.69%
Total 39 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Monogamous or not.
#71
RE: Monogamous or not.
(June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am)MJ the Skeptical Wrote:
(June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am)paulpablo Wrote: I find it easy to find women who are non monogamous. I said in my previous post this is a subjective experience.  Although if you have an internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women while trying very hard I'd say you must be really really bad at using the internet in general.

 Women in other species aren't called women, you're thinking of females. It depends upon the breeding strategy of the species as to whether or not they choose dependable fathers, there's something called r/K selection theory, some people apply this theory to different breeding patterns of humans.

Yes if a guy goes around saying they're non monogamist they will be repellent for women I imagine.  But it was very rare for me to talk about monogamy or non monogamy with any girl I had sex with when I was living a very non monogamous lifestyle.  Sex would occur before any deep conversation about ethics, morality or lifestyle choices were mentioned.

So yes the words "I'm non monogamous" are possibly more repellent to a woman than the words "I'm monogamous"  But being non monogamous means, purely by definition, that you are with more than one woman in a short period of time.  Being monogamous means that you're with one woman over a significant amount of time in a relationship.  And you're repelling, or at least not actively trying to attract any other women, unlike the person who is non monogamous who by definition has attracted at least two women at the same time.

So fucking dumb and generalized...there are plenty of factors why it's hard to find a minority group which has nothing to do "not being able to use the internet" you condescending cunt.

Like; Location, Specific desires, Your gender, Your age, Your demeanor, Your choices etc.

Yeah, in your anecdotal subjective experience it was easy, good for you romeo, you don't get to generalize people who can't because it was "easy" for you, that's fucking stupid. You even admit if people go around saying they don't fall under the strict monogamous label it's not going to be easy to find like minded people, as is such the case on the internet. Especially if you are a guy, who has to try much harder than a woman does to find what he wants. And yet again you are just dead fucking wrong, just because you are non-monogamous does not mean you are always around tons of vaginas. You could just not be into relationships which would disqualify you from monogamy as well.

You are a piece of shit on the end of my shoe, lick yourself off my shoe, go on lick it.

I didn't say there wasn't many reasons why it's difficult to find a minority group. I said if you have an Internet connection and you can't find non monogamous women you must be bad at using the Internet you stupid sack of cat shit.

You smell like a donkey's ball sack and I can smell you from here. You're the one who is generalising by saying that non monogamy results in being unattractive to women, I didn't generalise, I told my personal experience and I presented it as my personal experience, I then made what I think is a logical statement in that if you are non monogamous then you're attracting at least two women during a short period of time.

And I didn't say if you're non monogamous you will be around tons of vagina, I said if you're non monogamous you will be around at least 2 vaginas in a short period of time

You massive fat twat


Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.

Impersonation is treason.





Reply



Messages In This Thread
Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:14 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 5, 2016 at 10:21 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:23 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Ravenshire - June 5, 2016 at 10:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:26 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 7:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:38 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 5, 2016 at 10:52 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 10:59 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 5, 2016 at 10:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 5, 2016 at 10:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 7:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:50 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Chad32 - June 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Heatheness - June 5, 2016 at 10:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 5, 2016 at 10:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 5, 2016 at 10:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:01 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:02 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 5, 2016 at 11:06 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 5, 2016 at 11:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 6, 2016 at 11:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by madog - June 5, 2016 at 11:11 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 6, 2016 at 12:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 12:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 6, 2016 at 4:00 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 6:37 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 6, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 4:26 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 6:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 6, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 6, 2016 at 8:31 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 6:54 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 7:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 7, 2016 at 7:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:55 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 9, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 7:38 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:12 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:14 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:15 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 8:27 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:28 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by SofaKingHigh - June 27, 2016 at 9:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:06 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 8:25 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:30 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:07 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 11:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:09 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 6, 2016 at 7:36 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 6, 2016 at 6:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by account_inactive - June 6, 2016 at 6:24 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by brewer - June 6, 2016 at 7:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Jenny A - June 6, 2016 at 2:44 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2016 at 4:20 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Gemini - June 6, 2016 at 8:46 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Athene - June 6, 2016 at 9:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by KevinM1 - June 7, 2016 at 1:58 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Catholic_Lady - June 7, 2016 at 3:41 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 7, 2016 at 3:56 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Thumpalumpacus - June 7, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 9, 2016 at 4:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 7, 2016 at 7:03 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 7, 2016 at 8:08 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:32 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by lisah - June 11, 2016 at 8:11 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by J a c k - June 7, 2016 at 8:35 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Valkyrie - June 7, 2016 at 8:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 7, 2016 at 10:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 8, 2016 at 5:57 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Losty - June 8, 2016 at 2:48 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 3:50 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by ignoramus - June 8, 2016 at 4:13 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - June 8, 2016 at 6:39 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Regina - June 8, 2016 at 3:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by YahwehIsTheWay - June 9, 2016 at 10:02 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Cecelia - June 10, 2016 at 6:36 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 10, 2016 at 6:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:52 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Expired - June 27, 2016 at 7:56 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 7:59 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by bennyboy - June 27, 2016 at 8:07 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:31 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - June 27, 2016 at 8:34 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 8:53 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:01 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 9:05 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by chimp3 - June 27, 2016 at 9:10 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - June 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:09 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Little lunch - June 27, 2016 at 9:17 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Edwardo Piet - June 27, 2016 at 9:19 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:28 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by mlmooney89 - June 27, 2016 at 12:37 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by paulpablo - June 27, 2016 at 12:39 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by MJ the Skeptical - July 16, 2016 at 7:17 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Grand Nudger - June 27, 2016 at 3:25 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 16, 2016 at 7:10 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by BrokenQuill92 - July 16, 2016 at 8:27 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 9:16 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by rexbeccarox - July 16, 2016 at 9:55 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 16, 2016 at 10:12 pm
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 1:22 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by Whateverist - July 17, 2016 at 2:21 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 3:18 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by The Viking - July 17, 2016 at 4:08 am
RE: Monogamous or not. - by robvalue - July 17, 2016 at 4:10 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)