(April 26, 2011 at 12:37 am)padraic Wrote: What would be the current world population had there been: No black death in the Middle ages, no wars in say the last 100 years,no Stalin, no Mao, no Pol Pot,no famines and no AIDS? Keep in mind that humans breed at an exponential rate.
Of course,humanity needs drastic thinning,by about 80%. However, that should only be in places which will not effect me personally;such as India, China, Africa, South America, the Middle East (leaving the oil intact) and perhaps parts of the Southern USA.
Ok so if I looked at it from your point of view ... What do I really need from ANY of the nations from the rest of the world. We'll start by nuc-ing (nuclear bombing) Australia, then China, Japan, India and North Korea. We'll get the big ones out of the way first, than go around nuc-ing the middle east through all of Europe and end with Britain. Cause really ... who cares about human life ... as long as its not me.
I find this sentiment of yours repugnant and comparing complicit war to diseases and famine is just asinine. You are condoning the slaughter of billions of innocent people, when the real answer is just to keep the humans we have from breeding. No one dies. The herd is thinned, and the world stabilizes.
Pad, I knew Sae was morally reprehensible already but at least she's not a hypocrit about it. I direct you to your postings in the thread: "Would You Do It?"