Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2025, 6:23 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
Edwardo Piet Away
Devil's Supercardo.
Religious Views: Atheistic panexperientialism
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation: 132
#249
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?
June 28, 2016 at 7:55 am (This post was last modified: June 28, 2016 at 7:56 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(June 27, 2016 at 2:24 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: In Merriam Webster and a few other dictionaries, "being" and "exist" are somewhat circular (referencing each other), so I would say that according those definitions your reference to a non-existing being; is incoherent.

Equivocation fallacy again. You're equivocating "being" like existence and a being as in a living entity.

(The equivocation fallacy pisses off my O.C.D. so much I know when I see it).


As for the rest of what you said: Take it away Esq! Big Grin
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion v
The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked?

Messages In This Thread
RE: The Ontological Argument - valid or debunked? - by Edwardo Piet - June 28, 2016 at 7:55 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God athrock 429 97335 March 14, 2016 at 2:22 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Why theists think their irrational/fallacious beliefs are valid Silver 26 7750 May 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)