Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 11, 2025, 5:12 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No, No Arks Required........
#19
RE: No, No Arks Required........
(June 27, 2016 at 12:50 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Here, Rhonda. 

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notroc...3FYRqLQPmY


Quote:Scientists finish a 53-year-old classic experiment on the origins of life

Quote:Using modern techniques, around a billion times more sensitive than those Miller would have used, Parker identified 23 different amino acids in the vials, far more than the five that Miller had originally described. Seven of these contained sulphur, which is either a first for science or old news, depending on how you look at it. Other scientists have since produced sulphurous amino acids in similar experiments, including Carl Sagan. But unbeknownst to all of them, Miller had beaten them to it by several years.

That's nice, except it is now generally accepted that Miller and Urey's notion of the content of the primordial earth atmosphere was all wrong.  So Miller Urey shows some steps in creation of amino acid can be achieved in a simple laboratory experiment that uses conditions unlike those that actually prevailed on earth at the origin of life.  That's it.  It didn't offer insight into how by far the most important and poorly understood step, which is how the right amino acids are concentrated and encouraged to react in thermal dynamically plausible ways that wouldn't blow the whole thing apart, can be achieved.  So It's actual value in replicating any step in origin of life is much overstated and not remotely as high as once thought.

People should really caveat Miller Urey if they wanted to cite Miller Urey in arguing the process of origin of life is understood.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
No, No Arks Required........ - by Minimalist - June 26, 2016 at 1:27 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Gawdzilla - June 26, 2016 at 1:31 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Rhondazvous - June 26, 2016 at 1:46 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Gawdzilla - June 26, 2016 at 1:59 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by The Grand Nudger - June 26, 2016 at 2:00 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Rhondazvous - June 26, 2016 at 3:00 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by vorlon13 - June 26, 2016 at 2:28 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Rhondazvous - June 26, 2016 at 3:13 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by vorlon13 - June 26, 2016 at 3:04 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Rhondazvous - June 26, 2016 at 3:32 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by vorlon13 - June 26, 2016 at 3:15 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Rhondazvous - June 26, 2016 at 3:40 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by dyresand - June 29, 2016 at 1:17 am
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Expired - June 29, 2016 at 5:14 am
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Cyberman - June 29, 2016 at 9:21 am
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Minimalist - June 26, 2016 at 3:26 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by The Grand Nudger - June 26, 2016 at 3:45 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Rhondazvous - June 27, 2016 at 12:22 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Minimalist - June 27, 2016 at 12:50 pm
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Anomalocaris - June 29, 2016 at 7:03 am
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Gawdzilla - June 29, 2016 at 7:41 am
RE: No, No Arks Required........ - by Ayen - June 29, 2016 at 1:04 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I'm Sure This Will Start The Creatards Talking About Arks... Minimalist 5 1865 May 7, 2016 at 6:22 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Of Round Arks and other bullshit Minimalist 2 1207 January 6, 2012 at 6:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)