(July 2, 2016 at 1:08 pm)abaris Wrote:(July 2, 2016 at 1:06 pm)Jehanne Wrote: My point in posting this thread is that no one on this board should take anything that Craig says seriously; of course, the atheists here already do that, but any "believers" who are reading this, take note of the fact that Craig is a dishonest, lying charlatan who, along with his wife, is raking in your hard-earned dollars. Don't listen to him and don't buy any of his stuff.
OK .... I guess. You think that theists subscribing to Craig are swayed by that?
They should be swayed in the "opposite" direction, to one of not trusting anything that Craig says. He plays the exact same games with respect to higher Biblical scholarship as he does with the physical sciences. Look, I could say to you, "Most scholars of the Quran believe it to be divinely inspired." But, is that "proof" that the Quran is "divinely inspired"? Ditto for the New Testament and Craig's "most scholars accept blah, blah, blah...."
Craig's citing of the 2011 CERN superluminal results is a major blunder on his part (not the first and not the last, to be sure); most of his followers will, I grant, not care. But, for those of you who are on the fence, take note; Craig is a dishonest scholar who will take and twist anything to suite his religion.
