(July 2, 2016 at 1:56 pm)Jehanne Wrote: They should be swayed in the "opposite" direction, to one of not trusting anything that Craig says. He plays the exact same games with respect to higher Biblical scholarship as he does with the physical sciences. Look, I could say to you, "Most scholars of the Quran believe it to be divinely inspired." But, is that "proof" that the Quran is "divinely inspired"? Ditto for the New Testament and Craig's "most scholars accept blah, blah, blah...."
Craig's citing of the 2011 CERN superluminal results is a major blunder on his part (not the first and not the last, to be sure); most of his followers will, I grant, not care. But, for those of you who are on the fence, take note; Craig is a dishonest scholar who will take and twist anything to suite his religion.
You can't fight a snake oil salesman. the ones he reaches to, are already convinced, and in hunger for expensive wording to sugar coat their own fantasies they use him and give him money... for doing nothing. I have not a christian mindset, as in, trying to make a buck out of others idiocy.
Good luck beçieving an afterlife dumbfucks.
