RE: More nonsense from William Craig...
July 2, 2016 at 2:49 pm
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2016 at 2:50 pm by Jehanne.)
(July 2, 2016 at 2:25 pm)0000 Wrote:(July 2, 2016 at 1:56 pm)Jehanne Wrote: They should be swayed in the "opposite" direction, to one of not trusting anything that Craig says. He plays the exact same games with respect to higher Biblical scholarship as he does with the physical sciences. Look, I could say to you, "Most scholars of the Quran believe it to be divinely inspired." But, is that "proof" that the Quran is "divinely inspired"? Ditto for the New Testament and Craig's "most scholars accept blah, blah, blah...."
Craig's citing of the 2011 CERN superluminal results is a major blunder on his part (not the first and not the last, to be sure); most of his followers will, I grant, not care. But, for those of you who are on the fence, take note; Craig is a dishonest scholar who will take and twist anything to suite his religion.
You can't fight a snake oil salesman. the ones he reaches to, are already convinced, and in hunger for expensive wording to sugar coat their own fantasies they use him and give him money... for doing nothing. I have not a christian mindset, as in, trying to make a buck out of others idiocy.
Good luck beçieving an afterlife dumbfucks.
I listen to Craig's debates not because I care in the slightest what he has to say (he does not even need to show-up; just bring a cassette tape recording of one of his previous debates); rather, I like to listen to hear what his opponents have to say! Craig is monotonous boredom, like re-reading an issue of Penthouse from 30 years ago, absent any pictures; however, his opponents, for the most part, have always brought novel and thoughtful ideas with them to the auditorium.
