RE: More nonsense from William Craig...
July 2, 2016 at 8:13 pm
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2016 at 8:16 pm by Jehanne.)
(July 2, 2016 at 6:56 pm)Gemini Wrote: One of the best moments came when Craig's collaborator, James Sinclair, was forced by Carroll to concede that the Aguirre-Gratton model is perfectly consistent with the BGV theorem, leaving them with only their a priori argument against an actual infinite to support the Kalam.
Thanks for the information!!! I have been looking for a video of that second debate but have not been able to find it until now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osvglh99kUU
For some unknown reason, it has never showed-up in Yahoo's list of suggested videos, at least for me.
I am glad that you brought-up Craig's "actual infinite" argument, because this is yet another prime example of Craig's hypocrisy and duplicity. Craig loves to quote singularity theorems, which is basically what BGV is; however, singularities are, of course, regions of space/time that have infinite curvature to them. In other words, singularities are actual infinities.
