RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
July 4, 2016 at 9:21 am
(July 4, 2016 at 9:09 am)Losty Wrote:(July 4, 2016 at 3:32 am)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Awesome, and I was happy to show solidarity by censoring any posting of male nipples I had on my agenda - which was none. However, that did not seem to be what the ask was.
The ask seemed to be that the staff enforce that on everyone, which is an entirely different kettle of fish.
Unfortunately we saw our forum triple its man nips collection since that thread. Probably my fault. But the referendum really was an obvious win for mandatory man nips.
To be honest, I think I've seen about 5 people post topless pictures in the entire time I have been a member on this forum. That's even after the whole man nips fiasco. I don't see this being a huge issue in the future. I will continue to not post man nips. I don't remember ever having posted any to begin with but if I have, I've also posted rule appropriate female nipples so I hope that evens out the score.
It appeared to me that the request was that we either ban man nips or that we admit to being sexist. I had no interest in doing either, personally.
Why not admit to being 'sexist' in the sense of unequal treatment when that is true? Doesn't mean we want to be sexist. We just can't afford equal nip treatment when to do so will alert the google nano-bots, thereby undermining the financial viability of the site.
