(July 6, 2016 at 12:45 am)Maelstrom Wrote:The world of science, in which human beings are animals, and in which our bodily functions are facts of nature. The non-Victorian, non-Christian world in which the powers that be don't get to control our minds and behaviors by demonizing body parts and creating a sense of shame where there should be only innocence and acceptance.(July 6, 2016 at 12:44 am)bennyboy Wrote: Not really. Nudity, in any form and at any age, is not intrinsically illegal, nor is it immoral.Upon which planet are you living?
(July 5, 2016 at 11:48 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Wow. You're a total cunt.So your response to a behavior of mine that you don't like, IN A THREAD ABOUT A FEMINIST ISSUE, is to attempt to insult me with an explicitly anti-feminist, highly-offensive sexual term? If I had my way, I'd ban usage of terms like that in the forums wayyy before I banned breastfeeding boobies or any other kind of nudity. Call me an asshole, or a jerk, or a loser, or a troll. But please. . . don't demonize the wonderful thing that is the female reproductive organ by using it as an insult. Not cool, bruh.
(July 6, 2016 at 1:58 am)Losty Wrote:I've said my peace, I feel I've been heard. I still disagree with the values and motivations of the powers that be, but I accept that these are unlikely to change. I'm not really a crusader for child nudism, pornographic or otherwise-- but I was annoyed by some misinformation, miscommunication, and the way things were handled.(July 6, 2016 at 1:54 am)Maelstrom Wrote: To be honest, though, this topic has already sunk into the ground.I think so. Here at least. Benny seems content I think...we'll see.
There is no more discussion to be had.
The information is now pretty well-formed and unambiguous. The communication has gone through its life cycle, and the things were handled with good intent and no long-lasting effect.
I keep saying I'm done, and I reserve the right to be undone again if someone says something I want to respond to.
But I'm done.
