(July 13, 2016 at 1:27 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(July 13, 2016 at 12:56 pm)madog Wrote: Look I made a statement "Natural selection, good or bad is based on empirical evidence" Why have you suddenly switched it to Evolution? Regardless of whether or not you believe in evolution or creationism this is an excepted fact .... this can be observed today in action.
Note: even many new earth creationists accept "natural selection" though some believe "far from being proof for evolution and against creationism, natural selection is quite a reasonable and “God-given” process whereby we observe a certain genotype (the genetic makeup of an organism or group of organisms) that has pre-existed and has gradually adapted to one particular environment."
Now you countered my statement with
"A bit of a change of topic, but ok...I'll bite. The Gospel is based on empirical evidence as well."
The Gospel (message) was in short that God sent his only son to die for ours sins and was crucified ....
You said you had empirical evidence for the Gospel (message)? I wanted to know that empirical evidence ...
It appears you were just playing games with me
Sorry, natural selection was mentioned, but I didn't notice the change. I would agree, that "natural selection" is fairly well supported.
