(July 17, 2016 at 9:22 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:(July 17, 2016 at 9:17 pm)Spirian Wrote: That's my entire point. The music takes on the persona of the subjective listener, but the music itself, has no sexuality.
And in case you forgot reading comprehension from when you were in school so so long ago, the thread title is not gay music.
(July 17, 2016 at 9:57 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:(July 17, 2016 at 9:56 pm)Spirian Wrote: Yeah, we're done
No, why? /sarcasm.
(July 17, 2016 at 10:01 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:(July 17, 2016 at 10:00 pm)Spirian Wrote: Insults about my age and reading comprehension. Really? /sarcasm.
You might want to read up on the definition of sarcasm. Just stating.
Your comment about my reading comprehension made no mention of sarcasm.
It was when I responded to your insult that you used the "sarcasm" ploy (sarcastically I might add).
Then, you conflate your own two responses in an attempt to backpedal, and then you top it off with yet another insult about my comprehension.
So let me see if I have this right... Anyone who challenges you has a reading comprehension issue or some other "problem", yes?
That's called an ad-hom pal. I know you know what that is
I don't want a flame war, sir. I want discussion.
