(July 28, 2016 at 2:26 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(July 28, 2016 at 1:56 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: (My emphasis.) Fixed that for you, unless you have some evidence for thinking Hillary was in league with the party but Bernie was not.
Have you seen the email leaks from the DNC? Lots of DNC officials talking and plotting about how to sabotage the Sanders campaign, not so much (at all) for trying to make Clinton appear bad. Also, check up on how the burden of proof works. I'm not making a claim about Sanders, I'm making a claim about the DNC and Clinton, which I have evidence for. If you think Sanders was in league with the DNC, that is your claim, and it is up to you to provide the proof.
You haven't addressed my point. The fact that party officials were working to favor Clinton does not mean they were working in cooperation with Clinton. You haven't said anything to establish that she was involved in the planning or execution. So essentially you are just smearing her based on the fact that the shady dealing favored her.
My point was never that Sanders was behind it. Rather, I'm saying neither do I accept that Hillary was unless you have something more to offer.
