I don't think Jill Stein is capable of leading this country. I agree with her on a number of issues, but I don't think that she'd make a good President. There are a lot of times she sounds like she doesn't know what she's talking about (Quantitative Easing, for example) She also supports funding of psuedo science, and on the whole supports things like Homeopathy, and expecting science to prove a negative (when it comes to GMO's).
For that matter, she's yet to really generate interest in herself aside from her being "Not Clinton" and "Not Trump". It's basically a protest vote. I voted for her in 2012. But I won't be voting for her this time around. Not just because of Donald Trump. But because I don't really think she has what it takes to be President. She's failed to stand out from the crowd like she really needs to. Especially because she's a third party candidate. On top of it all, she has little experience in politics. A vote for her basically is a vote for 'none of the above', which is fine--but it's not going to put her anywhere close to getting 5% of the vote.
For that matter, she's yet to really generate interest in herself aside from her being "Not Clinton" and "Not Trump". It's basically a protest vote. I voted for her in 2012. But I won't be voting for her this time around. Not just because of Donald Trump. But because I don't really think she has what it takes to be President. She's failed to stand out from the crowd like she really needs to. Especially because she's a third party candidate. On top of it all, she has little experience in politics. A vote for her basically is a vote for 'none of the above', which is fine--but it's not going to put her anywhere close to getting 5% of the vote.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
